.

captnswilson:

No but Makkari and Druig getting the fandom’s love only with four short moments they shared… Ahh the power they have

pineappletheatrekid:

The Soulmateism of Druig constantly asking questions about everything and Makkari constantly searching for knowledge. They really are a perfect pair 🥺

angstdelights:

image
image
image

Barry Keoghan (Druig) being the number one fan of his own ship. Drukkari serve.

1, 2, 3

mystrothedefender:
“its nice to know that this is something that other people do too.
”

mystrothedefender:

its nice to know that this is something that other people do too.

luvclud:

st4lker:

st4lker:

image

HELP

image

gupi is tony hawk’s son btw which makes this even funnier.

musicalsilence:

objectlessondujour:

hotvampireadjacent:

image

The book is 1984, which is neither. It’s anti-authoritarian, which tells you a lot.

Ya know, sometimes I wish the joke *didn’t* write itself.

solidsnakesasscheeks:

door-maker-gal:

I hate how on Tumblr, a username like lisa486 is almost certainly a pornblot, while someone named solidsnakesasscheeks is almost certainly a real person

I could be a porn bot if I wanted to

seravph:

i think anne magills paintings and Edward hoppers are like .. exact opposites. hoppers has the distinct clarity to it, a sharpness in the lines and the angles that contributes to an overwhelming sense of loneliness in almost every one of his paintings. even in his paintings that dont portray isolation there is a feeling of separation

image
image

loneliness vs. aloneness

magill, on the other hand, has this haziness to her paintings that emanates a warmth even when the subjects in her paintings are alone.

image
image

both paintings feel so comforting, and even in the second one where the girl is alone she is still in the presence of the visceral world around her - there’s a familiarity in magills painting that she captures nicely.

i guess i just think it’s interesting because hopper and magill are two of my favorite artists and they paint similar scenes with very different tones -

image
image

I’ve always thought that hoppers paintings are a snapshot of urban loneliness - the distinctness of it, the use of cool colors, the stark contrast between the people and their settings - whereas magills paintings seem almost like memories - their use of haziness and blurriness is exactly how someone would remember something, indistinct, full of feeling and lacking detail